Chief Executive Order 22, Police Order 2002
14. Appointment of experts.--(1) The Government may, on recommendation of the appropriate Public Service Commission, appoint one or more experts to assist the Provincial Police Officer and Capital City Police Officer or City Police Officer.
(2) The qualifications, eligibility, terms and conditions of service of experts shall be as prescribed.
15. Posting of City Police and District Police Officer.--(1) The Provincial Police Officer may post a City Police Officer for a city district notified as a general police area and the District Police Officer in a district within a general police area [with the approval of] the Government.
(2) The term of office of City Police Officer or District Police Officer, as the case may be, shall be three years from the date of his posting.
[(3) Under exceptional circumstances due to exigency of service or on grounds of misconduct and inefficiency which warrant major penalty under the relevant rules, the City Policy Officer or District Police Officer may be transferred, with the approval of the Government, before completion of the term of office.]
16. Administration of police in a District.--(1) Subject to this Order, the administration of police throughout a district, other than capital city district and a city district, shall vest in a District Police Officer posted under Article 15.
(2) The District Police Officer may delegate any of his powers and functions conferred on him to a Superintendent of Police, Assistant or Deputy Superintendent of Police posted under Article 17.
(3) The Capital City Police Officer and the City Police Officer shall have administrative and financial powers of the head of an attached department.
(4) A Capital City Police Officer posted under Article 11 and a City Police Officer posted under Article 15 shall exercise the powers vested in them under clause (3) above and Article 10 subject to the operational control by the Provincial Police Officer.
18. Posting of head of investigation.--(1) The head of investigation in a general Police area other than the Capital City District or the City District shall be of the rank of Additional Inspector General of Police.
(2) The head of investigation in a Capital City District or City District shall not be below the rank of Senior Superintendent of Police.
(3) The head of investigation in a District shall not be below the rank of Superintendent of Police and shall be responsible to his own hierarchy subject to general control of the District Police Officer [;]
[Provided that the Investigation Wing shall be located within the Police Station and shall be responsible to its own hierarchy in the District under the general control of Officer-in-Charge of the Police Station.]
(4) All registered cases shall be investigated by the investigation staff in the district under the supervision of the head of investigation:
Provided that the Government may, by a special or general order, may entrust investigation of offences under Local and Special Laws as defined in the Pakistan Penal Code and punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years with or without any other punishment, to the police station staff.
(5) The District Police Officer shall not interfere with the process of investigation. The head of investigation shall however keep the District Police Officer informed of the progress of all cases which have a bearing on public order. The District Police Officer shall provide full support to the Head of investigation in the performance of his duties.
(6) Investigation shall not be changed except after due deliberations and recommendations by a board headed by an officer not below the rank of Senior Superintendent of Police and two Superintendents of Police, one being incharge of the investigation of the concerned District:
Provided that the final order for the change of investigation shall be passed by head of investigation in the general police area who shall record reasons for change of such investigation:
Provided further that the second change of investigation may only be allowed with the approval of the Provincial Police Officer, or the Capital City Police Officer, as the case may be.
[Explanation.--For the purpose of this Article, "general control" means the relationship between the authority of the officer-in-charge of Investigation in a District or a Police Station and the District Police Officer and officer-in-charge of the Police Station, as the case may be. This relationship requires full support to the officer-in-charge of Investigation in the performance of his duties and officer-in-charge of Investigation shall coordinate with the District Police Officer or officer-in-charge of the police station, as the case may be, and provide information to him on all matters which have a bearing on watch and ward and public order functions. Any directions in this regard by the officer vested with general control shall not explicitly or impliedly interfere in the conduct of Investigation or transfer of investigation and diversion of manpower or resources of Investigation to other police functions.]
COMMENTARY
Police Order, 2002 was promulgated regulating the force of the police and the investigation. Investigation can only be transferred by adopting the procedure laid down therein. DIG has no jurisdiction to pass an order for the change of investigation of a case. The head of investigation in a general police area can order change of investigation on recommendations of the board of SPs constituted under the police Order. Revision accepted. PLJ 2008 Cr.C. (Lahore) 960.
Statement before Court not only creates estoppal but also deprives respondent/official of authority to pass order in question. Order in question, ordering re-investigation of case or conduct of investigation of the said statement of Police Official before Court was unlawful being militating against order passed by High Court. PLJ 2004 Lahore 1293.
Investigation by the investigating staff. Deliberate lapse on his part. All registered cases shall be investigated by the investigating staff in the district under the supervision of the head of investigation. No body to have an eye over the manner of investigation as has happend in such case. Until and unless a close look is not kept on the working of the investigating officers by supervisory officers as is mandated under Police Order, 2002, fruitful and requisite results of the investigations (i.e. fair and impartial) cannot be achieved. PLJ 2007 Cr.C. (Lahore) 1244.
Provision of Art. 18(6) of Police Order 2002, limits number of transfer of investigation only to providing therein procedure for second transfer, thus, transfer of investigation for the fifth time was not warranted especially when challan was submitted before Court. Order of re-investigation of case after taking cognizance of challan by trial Court amounted to act of removing of file from cause list of Court and thus, interrupting judicial process of law. Order of re-investigation of case by respondent being violative of Art. 18(6) of Police Order, 2002, as also contrary to commitment by Police Official before High Court, after putting in challan before competent Court was declared to be illegal, unlawful and of no legal effect. PLJ 2004 Lahore 1293.
Prayer for transfer of investigation. There is hardly any justification for declaring order of Inspector General of Police to have been passed without any lawful authority because Police Order, 2002 not debarring police officers from transferring investigation. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. However, a direction is issued to Inspector General of Police to ensure that investigation of case is completed within next 15 days and report submitted in concerned Court. PLJ 2004 Cr.C. (Lahore) 130.
The respondent, without assigning any reason whatsoever, was competent to change investigation for fourth time, especially when case was investigated on recommendations of committee constituted u/S. 18. Order of re-investigation for fourth time, without any reason, without seeking any recommendations from committee so constituted and without referring any provision of law, indicates that respondent did not apply his conscious judicial mind. Non-speaking order of respondent which offends provisions of Punjab Police Order, 2002 cannot be allowed to be maintained at law being illegal, void and contrary to mandatory provisions of law. Petition allowed. PLJ 2005 Lahore 747.
Such entrustment of investigation being in clear violation of Art. 18 (4) of Police Order, 2002, was patently illegal. Though such entrustment might not have the effect of vitiating the trial, the same would certainly damage fairness of investigation, one of the main objects sought to be achieved by Police Order, 2002, as well as credibility of the officer blatantly violating the law. Such officer would be exposing himself to disciplinary action and might also incur risk of penalty under Police Order, 2002. PLJ 2007 Cr.C. (Karachi) 195.
District Police Officer cannot interfere with process of investigation. First change of investigation can, in areas other than Capital City District, be ordered only by Additional Inspector General of Police (Investigation Branch) and that too only after deliberation and recommendation by a Board headed by a Senior Superintendent of Police and including two superintendents of police, one being in charge of investigation in concerned District. Change of investigation can only be allowed with approval of inspector General of Police. PLJ 2005 Lahore 1571 (FB).
Police Officers other than those mentioned in Article 18(6) of the Police Order, 2002 changing investigation of criminal cases in the name of `verification' of investigation. The law is quite settled on the point that where the law requires a thing to be done in a particular manner then that thing must be done in that manner alone or not at all. In any case if an investigation by an Investigating Officer is to be verified by some other officer then such verification must be confined to verification of the record of investigation and such an exercise cannot be allowed to be conducted in a manner giving it a colour of fresh investigation with fresh conclusions. The verifying officer has to confine himself to the record of investigation already conducted then the verifying officer can bring such fault to the notice of the Superintendent of Police (Investigation) of the concerned District who can then initiate the process contemplated by the provisions of Article 18(6) of the Police Order, 2002 for change of investigation. In some cases an impression is being entertained among some senior police officers that the provisions of Article 18(6) of the Police Order, 2002 pertain to `vertical' change of investigation and not to `horizontal' transfer of authorities outside and above the relevant District and the latter denoting transfer of investigation by officers performing duties with the relevant District. Such a distinction is not only innovative but totally artificial and self-created and a distinction motivated to defeat the very purposes of Article 18(6) of the Police Order, 2002 so as to perpetuate the mala fides for the removal of which the said Article had been introduced. All notions regarding such a distinction are liable to be rejected. PLD 2006 Lah. 609.
Investigating Officer could only identify the defect in investigation. If he had found any document fake S.P. Investigation could have activated process give under Article 18(6) of Police Order, 2002, for first change of investigation. PLD 2006 Lah. 609.
Verify officer could not have investigated the case himself during process of verification and pass direction to the local police to submit challan against the accused, etc. PLD 2006 Lah. 609.
Investigation conducted by the verifying officer was declared violative of law and was set aside. PLD 2006 Lah. 509.
Illegal and unauthorized change of investigation. Grievance of petitioner/accused was that his case earlier was investigated by S.H.O. Police Station concerned who, after completion of investigation, recorded finding of his innocence, but on telephonic message from D.P.O., investigation was entrusted to D.S.P. in the garb of verification and D.S.P. started re-investigation. D.P.O. had no jurisdiction either to change investigation or to have the case re-investigated in the garb of supervising investigation in terms of Art. 18 of the Police Order, 2002. Entire exercise of D.S.P. concerned in starting re-investigation of the case already concluded by S.H.O. was not only without authority, but also in violation of the rules of law. 2006 PCr.LJ 1596.
Instead of changing investigation in the garb of verification which was colourful exercise of jurisdiction by D.P.O., if he was not satisfied with the conduct of investigation he could place the matter before District Investigation Board seeking change of investigation, if he himself felt so or received any information from any person, alongwith his note giving reason for change of investigation. 2006 PCr.LJ 1596.
D.P.O. could also refer matter to Additional Inspector General Police as provided under Art. 18 of Police Order, 2002, but in no circumstances D.P.O. could either change investigation directly or in the garb of verification/supervision of investigation by any other person already conducted by competent authority. 2006 PCr.LJ 1596.
Cancellation report was prepared on verbal direction of S.S.P. (Investigation), which was not brought to the notice of the Magistrate. Magistrate passed impugned order without applying his judicial mind which was not at all sustainable in law. Whole exercise, leading to preparation of cancellation report, appeared to be manoeuvres by accused persons involved in F.I.R. in collusion with the police. Investigation conducted with the case and preparation of impugned police report, were declared to be violative of law and settled principles of superior Courts. Provisions of Police Order, 2002 had also been violated, in the case. Impugned order passed by Judicial Magistrate, was declared to have been passed without lawful authority and having no legal effect. 2006 PCr.LJ 1639.
19. Appointment of Director of Police Communications etc.--Subject to rules, Provincial Police Officer, or Capital City Police Officer, or City Police Officer, as the case may be, may appoint Director of Wireless, Motor Transport and Computer for the whole of the general police area or for any part thereof and such number of officers and staff as may be determined from time to time.
20. Posting of heads of police training institutions.--(1) The Federal Government shall post a police officer of the rank of Inspector General of Police as Commandant of the National Police Academy.
(2) Provincial Police Officer or Capital City Police Officer may post an officer not below the rank of Deputy Inspector General of Police as Commandant of the police training college and an officer not below the rank of Senior Superintendent of Police as Principal of each police training school within the general police area under his charge.
21. Constitution of regions and divisions etc.--(1) The Provincial Police Officer may with the approval of the Government constitute police regions.
[(2) The Provincial Police Officer, Capital City Police Officer or the City Police Officer may with the approval of the Government,--
(i) divide districts into police divisions, sub-divisions and police stations;
(ii) sub-divide the police stations into police posts; and
(iii) define the limits and extent of such divisions, sub-divisions, police stations and police posts;]
Provided that the limits and extent of such divisions, police stations and police posts shall, as far as practicable, be coterminus with the limits of Tehsils, or Town in a city district and Unions.
(3) A police region under clause (1) shall be headed by a police officer not below the rank of Deputy Inspector General of Police:
Provided that where the size of police establishment is more than ten thousand the region shall be headed by a police officer not below the rank of Additional Inspector General of Police.
(4) A police division shall be under an officer not below the rank of a Superintendent of Police; a police sub-division under an officer not below the rank of an Assistant or Deputy Superintendent of Police; and a police station shall be under an officer of the rank of Inspector of Police:
Provided that an officer of the rank of Assistant Superintendent of Police may be posted as head of a police station, assisted by Inspectors as officer incharge in selected police stations:
[Provided further that the term of office of an officer under whom a police division, sub-division or police station respectively is placed shall be the same as that of Head of District Police from the date of posting and any transfer before completion of his term of office will only take place due to exigency of service or misconduct warranting major penalty.]
22. Transfer to other police establishment.--Subject to rules, the appropriate Government may transfer any police officer appointed under this Order from police constituted for one general police area to another.
23. Appointment of junior ranks.--Subject to rules, Head of District Police shall be the appointing authority for junior ranks.
24. Oath or affirmation by members, of police.--(1) Every member of the police shall on appointment make and subscribe before Provincial Police Officer or Capital City Police Officer or City Police Officer, or head of a training institution, an oath or affirmation according to the form set out in the second Schedule.
(2) Assistant Superintendents of Police shall make and subscribe to the said oath or affirmation before Commandant, National Police Academy.
25. Certificate of appointment.--(1) Officers of junior ranks shall on appointment receive a certificate in the form provided in the Third Schedule. The certificate shall be issued under the seal of such officer as Provincial Police Officer or Capital City Police Officer or City Police Officer may by general or special order direct.
(2) A certificate of appointment shall become null and void whenever the police officer named therein ceases to belong to the police.
26. Suspension of police officer.--(1) Subject to rules, the authority or an officer authorised in this behalf by the authority shall have power to suspend a member of police.
(2) The powers and functions vested in a member of police shall remain suspended while such officer is under suspension:
Provided that notwithstanding his suspension such member shall not cease to be a member of police and shall continue to be subject to the control of the same authorities to which he would have been, but for his suspension.
27. General powers of Provincial Police Officer, etc.--Subject to this Order and rules made there-under, Provincial Police Officer and Head of District Police, as the case may be, shall within their respective spheres of authority, direct and regulate all matters of recruitment, training, postings, transfers, promotions, arms, drill, discipline, clothing, distribution of duties, and any other matter concerning the efficient fulfilment of duties by the police under his control.
28. Powers of Provincial Police Officer, Capital City Police Officer and City Police Officer concerning police accounts.--(1) Provincial Police Officer, Capital City Police Officer or City Police Officer shall have authority to investigate and regulate all matters of accounts connected with the police and all persons concerned shall be bound to give reasonable aid and facilities in conducting such investigation and to conform to his orders consequent thereto.
(2) The power of Provincial Police Officer, Capital City Police Officer and City Police Officer to regulate accounts under clause (1) shall be without prejudice to the Auditor General's authority to audit police accounts.
29. Appointment of special police officers.--(1) Subject to rules, Head of District Police may appoint special police officers for special purposes or occasions when the police available to him is not sufficient to assist the police under his command.
(2) Every special police officer so appointed shall, on appointment--
(a) receive a certificate in the prescribed form;
(b) have the same powers, and immunities and be liable to the same duties and responsibilities and be subject to the same authorities as a regular police officer.
30. Appointment of additional police.--(1) City Police Officer and District Police Officer subject to the approval of the Provincial Police Officer, and Capital City Police Officer may appoint additional police officers of such rank and for such time as he may deem fit for the purposes stated in their employment orders.
(2) Every additional police officer so appointed shall on appointment--
(a) receive a certificate in a form approved by Provincial Police Officer or Capital City Police Officer or City Police Officer as the case may be;
(b) be vested with all or any of the powers, privileges and duties of a police officer;
(c) be subject to orders of the Capital City Police Officer, City Police Officer and District Police Officer.
(3) The employment of additional police may be made at the request of any person reasonably requiring such police and the cost of such employment shall be recovered in such manner as provided under this Order or rules made there under.
31. Ministerial staff etc.--(1) Subject to rules, Provincial Police Officer, Capital City Police Officer and City Police Officer, as the case may be, may appoint ministerial staff and other employees to assist the police.
(2) Any person employed under clause (1) shall be under the direction and control of Provincial Police Officer, Capital City Police Officer, or City Police Officer, as the case may be.
(3) The powers of direction and control referred to in clause (2) shall include the powers of discipline and dismissal.
(4) Subject to rules, Provincial Police Officer, Capital City Police Officer or City Police Officer, as the case may be, may delegate his powers and authority under this Article to an officer of appropriate rank.
CHAPTER IV
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE HEAD OF DISTRICT POLICE
32. Policing Plan.--(1) Head of District Police shall prepare an annual Policing Plan consistent with Provincial Policing Plan wherever applicable in [coordination] with the Zila Nazim in the prescribed manner.
(2) The Policing Plan shall include--
(a) objectives of policing;
(b) financial resources likely to be available during the year;
(c) targets; and
(d) mechanism for achieving these targets.
(3) Head of District Police shall obtain the approval of the plan from the [concerned Commission at the District level] and send copies of the approved plan to Zila Nazim, Tehsil or Town Nazim, Provincial Government, Provincial Public Safety [and Police Complaints] Commission and Provincial Police Officer and in case of Islamabad Capital Territory to Zila Nazim, Islamabad District Public Safety Commission, National Public Safety Commission and Federal Government.
(4) Head of District Police shall prepare a report on the policing of the district during the year and send it to the [concerned Commission at the District level] by end of August.
33. Relationship of District Police with Zila Nazim etc.--(1) Subject to the provisions of this Order, Head of District Police shall be responsible to the Zila Nazim for police functions under this Order but shall not include administration of the district police, investigation of criminal cases and police functions relating to prosecution, which shall rest with the police:
Provided that Zila Nazim may visit a police station to find out if any person is under unlawful detention and in appropriate cases may also direct action in accordance with law having regard to the facts and
circumstances of the case.
(2) In case of a difference of opinion between the Zila Nazim and the [......] Government on any matter concerning the District Police, the decision of the [......] Government shall prevail.
[(3) In the normal channel of writing the Performance Evaluation Report of the Head of District Police, the Zila Nazim shall write the manuscript report of the Head of District Police in the specified part of the Form of Performance Evaluation Report provided in the Fourth Schedule, which shall be taken into consideration at the time of promotion of the Officer.]
34. Police support to Government functionaries, etc.--(1) Any functionary of the Federal Government, Provincial Government, any statutory body or any body or corporation owned, set up or controlled by any such Government or in which such Government has a controlling share or interest, District Government, Tehsil or Town Municipal Administration or Union Administration, or Cantonment Board may for the discharge of his official duties which in his opinion require police assistance, ask for police support from the concerned police authority of the area and such authority shall provide the requisite support:
Provided that, if for any reason, the police authority is unable to provide the police support requested under this clause it shall forthwith bring the matter through its channel of command to the notice of Head of District Police who shall make arrangement for provision of police support and, where he is unable to provide such support, he shall inform the Zila Nazim accordingly:
Provided further that before making a report to the higher officer, each officer in the chain of command shall make an effort to provide the requisite police support[:]
[* * *]
(2) Where the Zila Nazim so directs, the District Coordination Officer shall be responsible for Coordination of police support by Head of District Police to the District Government, Tehsil Municipal Administration, Union Administration and Cantonment Board in exigencies threatening law and order, natural calamities and emergencies.
[(3) * * *]
35. Responsibility on complaints of neglect and excesses by police.--(1) Where the Zila Nazim on the basis of any complaint or information has reason to believe that any police official has committed an act of neglect, failure or excess, or the Union Public Safety Committee on its own motion on receipt of a complaint from an aggrieved person reports to the Zila Nazim about police neglect, failure or excess, the Zila Nazim may direct Head of District Police to take remedial measures, including registration of First Information Report in a cognizable offence in appropriate cases within the period specified by him and the Zila Naizm shall inform the [concerned Commission at the District level] accordingly.
(2) Head of District Police or the concerned competent authority shall immediately take remedial measures, and may suspended the concerned official where necessary, initiate an enquiry and take appropriate action in accordance with law.
(3) Head of District Police shall without delay inform the Zila Nazim and [concerned Commission at the District level] of the action taken by him pursuant to the directions given under clause (1) and forward a copy of the final report of enquiry within forty five days of such directions.
COMMENTARY
Police Order, 2002 only requires prosecution to be initiated upon a written report but does not say that no arrest can take place without a warrant. Where the offence is punishable with imprisonment upto three years it would be deemed to be cognizable under second schedule to Cr.P.C. PLD 2005 Kar. 285.
Comments
Post a Comment