Chief Executive Order 22, Police Order 2002 155c case laws

 Citation Name:   PLJ  2019  Cr.C   1405

Appelant Side:    INJUM SAQIB and others

V    e    r    s    u    s

Opponent Side:   STATE, etc.

Judge Name:       SARDAR AHMED NAEEM

Other Law Journal References:    


criminal procedure code, 1898 (v of 1898)-- ----s. 498--pakistan penal code, 1860--ss. 221, 224, 225, 344 & 109--police order, 2002, s. 155-c & 157--bail before arrest--confirmed--illegal confinement--offence of intentional omission to apprehend accused--accused was police official--influenced on his subordinate--it is difficult for accused to prove element of mala fide, at this stage, through positive/solid evidence/material, therefore, same was to be deduced and inferred from facts and circumstances of case and that where events or hints to such effect are available, same would validly constitute element of malafide. [p. 1407] a

Citation Name:   PLJ  2016  Lahore High Court   760
Appelant Side:    MUHAMMAD JAWAD HAMID
V    e    r    s    u    s
Opponent Side:   HASEEB AKBAR, etc.
Judge Name:       SADAQAT ALI KHAN AND MRS. ERUM SAJAD GULL
Other Law Journal References:    

constitution of pakistan, 1973-- ----art. 199--pakistan penal code, (xlv of 1860), ss. 302, 34, 324, 353, 186, 148, 149, 290, 291, 427, 506-b, 109 and ss. 365, 452, 295-b, ppc added--pakistan arms ordinance, 1965, s. 13--police order, 2002, art. 155-c--anti-terrorism act, 1997, s. 7--constitutional petition--criminal case against different set of accused with different version regarding same occurrence--commencement of trials in different cases separately--validity--law is settled by now that different versions of same incident advanced by rival parties through cross-cases and different sets of accused persons is to be held simultaneously and side by side. [p. 764] a plj 1978 sc 221 & pld 2016 sc 70 rel.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PLJ 2019 Lahore 132

PLJ 2019 Lahore 132 [Multan Bench Multan] Present: Muzamil Akhtar Shabir, J. BAQIR HAMEED and another--Petitioners versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary and 4 others--Respondents W.P. No. 12396 of 2017, heard on 20.6.2018. Constitution of Pakistan, 1973-- ----Art. 199--Constitutional Petition--Recruitment of educators--Clearance of NTS and interview--Petitioners were selected--Withdrawal of appointment letters--Non-issuance of show-cause notice--Recruitment policy 2016-17--Equivalence of Master Degress--Principle of locus poenitenciae--Question of whether LLB degree would be treated equal to Graduation or Master--Determination--In advertisement for appointment, LL.B is one of academic qualifications required for purpose of appointment, which is mentioned alongwith qualification of Master Degree and degrees equivalent to Master and Bachelor are also included in prescribed qualification--Higher Education Commission vide its letter dated July 27th 2017, has declared Bachelor of la...
Read more
 Citation Name : 2008 MLD 1018 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Side Appellant : Sardar MUHAMMAD ASIF Side Opponent : State S. 514--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.419, 420 , 468, 471 & 109---Forfeiture of bond---Applicant stood surety for accused, memo of surety produced by applicant was accepted by the court below and after execution of bond, custody of accused was handed over to him with direction to produce accused on each and every date of hearing in court--Surety was duty bound to cause attendance of accused in court on each and every date of hearing and failure of accused to attend the court would react on the surety---If despite of notice served on surety by the court, he failed to produce accused in court, court would be within its right and power to forfeit surety bond under S.514, Cr.P.C. and further impose fine thereby directing surety to deposit full quantum of surety bond---Accused had frequently jumped bail with intention that reduced quantum of the surety bond would be dep...
Read more
 Citation Name : 2008 YLR 732 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Side Appellant : SHAHID Side Opponent : State S.497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.419 & 420 ---bail , grant of---Offences with which accused had been charged, did not fall within the prohibitory clause of S.497, Cr. P. C. ---Accused was behind the bars since his arrest on 2-12-2006---bail should not be withheld as a matter of punishment---Accused was admitted to bail , in circumstances. Citation Name : 2008 YLR 286 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD AFZAL Side Opponent : State S. 497---Offences in Respect of Banks (Special Courts) Ordinance (10 of 1984), Sched. ---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.408/420 /468/471/380-bail , refused of---Offences with which the accused were charged were mentioned in the Schedule attached with the Offences in Respect of Banks (Special Courts) Ordinance, 1984, provisions of which had the overriding effect, by virtue of its section 5 making the offences non-bail able---Accused were...
Read more