Citation Name : 2008 YLR 2686 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Side Appellant : SAJJAD AHMED

Side Opponent : CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU

S.497(2)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.409, 420 , 468, 471 & 34---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199---Constitutional petition---bail , grant of---Further inquiry---Constitutional petition earlier filed by accused was disposed of with direction that two witnesses be examined and through that very order accused was allowed to repeat the petition for bail ---Statements of said witnesses were to be scrutinized by the Trial Court to put a certainty of the liability upon accused, while the Trial Court had also to see as to whether the procedure had been followed or not; and in such a situation what would be liability of accused---Two other accused persons had been enlarged through bail ---Case of accused being of further inquiry, he was admitted to bail , in circumstances.



Citation Name : 2008 PLD 204 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Side Appellant : NASRULLH SHARIF

Side Opponent : State

S. 498---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.409, 420 , 468 & 471/34---Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), S.5(2)---Interim bail , confirmation of---Co-accused being public servants had been granted bail and some of them had been acquitted---Name of accused had not been mentioned in the F.I.R.---Accused was also entitled to grant of bail as a rule of consistency.



Citation Name : 2008 YLR 920 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Side Appellant : KAMRAN AHMED QURESHI

Side Opponent : State

S.498---Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Ss.420 , 421, 468 & 109---Pre-arrest bail , confirmation of---Name of accused was neither mentioned in the F.I.R. nor in the interim charge sheet---Role of accused was limited for referring a person for obtaining loan for the vehicle and the amount of commission involved was only Rs.8100---Case, in circumstances was fit where bail should be confirmed---Accused being on interim bail , his bail was confirmed on the same terms and conditions as were laid down in the interim order.




Citation Name : 2008 PCrLJ 1473 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD SIKANDAR MUGHAL

Side Opponent : State

S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.420 , 468, 477 & 109---bail , refusal of---Accused availed the loan facility from the Bank to the tune of Rs.10.12 million, but provided fictitious/forged documents to the Bank; it was in connivance with the co-accused and certain Bank officials or officers and just to save their skins accused persons deposited six instalments of a meagre amount---Investigating Officer had collected the documentary evidence to show that accused persons had distributed said amount among themselves---Such was a white-collar crime; accused persons, prima facie, being involved in the case, were not entitled to be enlarged on bail .



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PLJ 2019 Lahore 132

PLJ 2019 Lahore 132 [Multan Bench Multan] Present: Muzamil Akhtar Shabir, J. BAQIR HAMEED and another--Petitioners versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary and 4 others--Respondents W.P. No. 12396 of 2017, heard on 20.6.2018. Constitution of Pakistan, 1973-- ----Art. 199--Constitutional Petition--Recruitment of educators--Clearance of NTS and interview--Petitioners were selected--Withdrawal of appointment letters--Non-issuance of show-cause notice--Recruitment policy 2016-17--Equivalence of Master Degress--Principle of locus poenitenciae--Question of whether LLB degree would be treated equal to Graduation or Master--Determination--In advertisement for appointment, LL.B is one of academic qualifications required for purpose of appointment, which is mentioned alongwith qualification of Master Degree and degrees equivalent to Master and Bachelor are also included in prescribed qualification--Higher Education Commission vide its letter dated July 27th 2017, has declared Bachelor of la...
Read more
 Citation Name : 2008 MLD 1018 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Side Appellant : Sardar MUHAMMAD ASIF Side Opponent : State S. 514--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.419, 420 , 468, 471 & 109---Forfeiture of bond---Applicant stood surety for accused, memo of surety produced by applicant was accepted by the court below and after execution of bond, custody of accused was handed over to him with direction to produce accused on each and every date of hearing in court--Surety was duty bound to cause attendance of accused in court on each and every date of hearing and failure of accused to attend the court would react on the surety---If despite of notice served on surety by the court, he failed to produce accused in court, court would be within its right and power to forfeit surety bond under S.514, Cr.P.C. and further impose fine thereby directing surety to deposit full quantum of surety bond---Accused had frequently jumped bail with intention that reduced quantum of the surety bond would be dep...
Read more
 Citation Name : 2008 YLR 732 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Side Appellant : SHAHID Side Opponent : State S.497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.419 & 420 ---bail , grant of---Offences with which accused had been charged, did not fall within the prohibitory clause of S.497, Cr. P. C. ---Accused was behind the bars since his arrest on 2-12-2006---bail should not be withheld as a matter of punishment---Accused was admitted to bail , in circumstances. Citation Name : 2008 YLR 286 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD AFZAL Side Opponent : State S. 497---Offences in Respect of Banks (Special Courts) Ordinance (10 of 1984), Sched. ---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.408/420 /468/471/380-bail , refused of---Offences with which the accused were charged were mentioned in the Schedule attached with the Offences in Respect of Banks (Special Courts) Ordinance, 1984, provisions of which had the overriding effect, by virtue of its section 5 making the offences non-bail able---Accused were...
Read more